Re: gtk-term widget?

[Rob Huffstedtler <robhome bagpipe com>]

Perhaps more to the point, for me one of the attractions to GTK+ is the
windows port.  It would be nice to have a good cross-platform library
that doesn't cost a great deal on Windows.  Since gnome-libs is unlikely
to ever be ported to Windows, being too dependent on it is not a great
thing for those of us who are interested in targeting both windoze and
Linux/Unix with one source base.

On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Matthew
wrote:

> 
> >Zvt isn't gnome dependent, just cut-and-paste it if you have a
> >"gnome-libs bad" complex.
> 
> Not a very nice thing to say, Havoc.  He's probably like a lot of us that are
> growing more and more concerned with the assimilation of Gtk by Gnome.  Pretty
> soon the two will be one, and our executables will require 20M worth of
> libraries to run.  I'm starting to sense an "if your not with us, you're against
> us" philosophy coming from both the KDE and Gnome developers, and it's
> exceedingly harder to stay "Desktop Neutral".  The only thing left is:
> 
> if(!kde_compliant(pid))
>     kill(pid,9)
> 
> or the Gnome equiv embedded in the WM somewhere...
> 
> I write this half-joking.  I use Helix Gnome w/ kfm + Kmail.  But as I see more
> and more of the cooler widgets being Gnome-o-tized, and Gtk getting the
> leftovers, it makes this Gtk developer nervous.
> 
> Matthew
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-list mailing list
> gtk-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
>