Re: [gtk-list] Re: Gtk and C++ ?

[Peter Berlau <pberlau gmx de>]

Matt Goodall writes:
 > Cyril Picard wrote:
 > 
 > > Thank you for your quick answer !
 > 
 > No problem.
 > 
 > > I think I will use the Gtk-- API. Does anybody tried it ?? does it
 > > work fine, or is it until under unstable development state ?
 > 
 > I'm using it and it seems fine. By the way, gtk-- is actually a wrapper
 > around the gtk+ API and gnome API.
 > 
 > There is a stable version at 1.0.3 (I think) and a development version
 > at 1.1.1.
 > 
 > Note that gdk support (the stuff under gtk) is not complete yet but that
 > would probably only matter if you need to do drawing or write your own
 > widgets. Even then you can probably resort to 'C'.
 > 
 > The Gtk-- developers have done their best to keep the c++ API as similar
 > as possible to the c API. The big differences are signals and type
 > safety but they just improve things.
 > 
 > There has been a big change to the signal system for the 1.1.x series so
 > If you can afford to wait for the next stable version and aren't
 > frightened by the possibility of finding a bug or two then I would start
 > using version 1.1.1 now.
 > 
 > Good luck and have fun, Matt.
 > 
 > --
 > Matt Goodall             |  Isotek Electronics Ltd
 > email: mgg@isotek.co.uk  |  Claro House, Servia Road
 > Tel: +44 113 2343202     |  Leeds, LS7 1NL
 > Fax: +44 113 2342918     |  England
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > -- 
 > To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
 > 
 >