Re: [gtk-list] Re: Why is system visual == DefaultVisual?
- From: Dave Reed <dreed capital edu>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- CC: federico redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: Why is system visual == DefaultVisual?
- Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 15:39:30 -0500 (EST)
> From: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@redhat.com>
>
> > The problem is that gdk_visual_get_system returns the result of the
> > DefaultVisual Xlib call, which on my system at least just returns the
> > visual of the root window. This means all gtk applications get an 8-bit
> > visual, which is bad because there are not that many of them, and why
> > use 8 bits, when there are better visuals?
> >
> > Does anyone know if there is a reason not to use a TrueColor or
> > DirectColor 24-bit visual if there is one available as the default
> > visual in gtk?=20
>
> Because the fat visuals consume a lot more resources than 8-bit
> pseudocolor, and they are slower.
>
> The idea of having multiple visuals is that most of your application's
> UI can run in a small and lean visual, like 8-bit pseudocolor, while
> areas that need high quality images can use fatter visuals. And some
> hardware lets you pop up an 8-bit pseudocolor window over a 24-bit
> truecolor one, and when it goes away, no exposures will be sent to the
> 24-bit window, thus increasing performance.
[snip]
> Federico
On a related note, can you tell me how to get a 24 bit visual for a
widget that is using 8-bit pseudocolor?
I've run into this on Suns when getting a drawing area widget and end
up with an 8 bit visual and want a 24 bit visual.
Is the following ok (as long as I do it before the widget is realized)?
GdkVisual *vis_24 = gdk_visual_get_best_with_depth(24);
if (vis_24) {
gtk_widget_set_visual(GTK_WIDGET(widget_), vis_24);
}
Thanks,
Dave
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]