RE: [gtk-list] Re: Slowness of c++]
- From: "Steven Hébert" <Steven Hebert bauernike com>
- To: <gtk-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: [gtk-list] Re: Slowness of c++]
- Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 10:50:57 -0400
Mario ,
I didn't mean to piss you off,
But that is the result I got yesterday!
I should have mentioned that it was a first impression.
I'll be looking at the reason for the problem.
BTW I'l try VDK on my 5.3 distro as soon as I have a chance. I also like the
Bor-land feel you gave VDK.
I've trying a few tools similar to yours, I was pissed at the fact that it
didn't run as I expected on my box (not blaming your tool here either).
Check out my (incomplete web page).
http://pages.infinit.net/bdse
Look for VDK near the bottom
Send me a banner or .GIF and I'll use it.
Cheers
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Motta [mailto:mmotta@guest.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 1999 9:47 AM
To: gtk-list@redhat.com
Subject: [gtk-list] Re: Slowness of c++]
On Tue, 01 Jun 1999, you wrote:
>
>Hey Kurt,
>
>I took a look at VDK just yesterday.
>That thing almost kill my machine, it was clawling.
>
>You probably like the feel of VDK, but the tool doesn't cut it (just yet).
>
>I would usu C++ and GTK+, or if you'ld like a GUI tool use GLADE. It has no
>build in editor, but it saves a bit of time building the GUI.
>
>Cheers
>
i suppose you used testvdk program that is the most comprehensive one and
that
tests almost all vdk features.
Well, on my box : PII 200 mhz with 64 mb of RAM testvdk never eats more
than
15% of cpu time (peek) and never more than 4% of ram.
VDK has more than 200 user at this time, nobody reported me slowness problem
neither system killing.
However everyone is free to use whatever tool he/she prefere,
i'm aware to make vdk better and better, resolve problems and fix bugs, but
please i can't fight with generic and undocumented complains.
regards
/mario
> Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote:
>Hello,
> This might not be the correct play for this question, but maybe
>someone's knows the answer.
> I'm changing a C program using gtk into a C++ with the VDK
>wrapper. I've noticed that while they both are using
>gtk_timeout_add, the C++ is ..much.. slower than the C one.
>Basically, the C++ program is using a lot more CPU and the mouse
>is very sluggish..it take almost a second after clicking on the close
>window button for the program to quit. The C program however is
>quite fast with no noticeable slowness.
> Is this due to the C++ wrapper VDK? Poor C++ programming (I
>am a novice)? Or what?
> Thanks,
> Kurt
>
--
Mario Motta
AI Research Group - Rimini
mmotta@guest.net
http://www.guest.net/homepages/mmotta/VDKHome/index.htm
--
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]