Re: [gtk-list] Introspection not completely implemented
- From: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Introspection not completely implemented
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 04:42:40 +0100 (CET)
On Thu, 18 Feb 1999 andrew@cogent.ca wrote:
> I have noticed that many of the GTK+ widgets are incompletely
> implemented - the introspection information is largely absent. That
> is, the argument definitions (name, type, R/W access) are not being
> set in the _class_init() functions, and the _get_arg and _set_arg
> functions have not been implemented. I cannot think of a good design
> reason why these are not done, so I'll assume that they just haven't
> been tackled yet. I am working on a project that wants complete
> introspection information available for all widgets, so ...
>
> Is anybody working on this? If not, what must I do to ensure that if
> I write 1000 lines of introspection code it will be integrated into
> the overall GTK+ release? I am willing to do this, I just need to
> know how to submit it when it is done.
we´ve been slowly adding widget arguments as time permits.
you might want to look at gle which is in GNOME CVS, it
displays the widget tree of a certain window and lets you
fire up a widget editor where you can edit all available
widget erguments.
to help us out on the widget argument implementation, please
take a widget that doesn´t yet implement widget arguments and
post the patch here or load it up to ftp.gtk.org. valid
contributions will usually be intergrated into the main
gtk+ desitribution without problems. however, please don´t
patch up 10 or 20 widgets and provide one mega patch.
>
> Andrew Thomas
>
---
ciaoTJ
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]