Re: [gtk-list] Re: Versioning question

[Matthew <matthew mattshouse com>]

> From what you say, I have the *very* strong feeling that you
> didn't... if you had done so, you wouldn't think about distributing a
> binary application "that links statically to GTK+".  As that would
> violate the GTK+ license terms (said GNU LGPL).

As long as the source is available, he is not violating the GPL.  You are
allowed to statically link and distribute.

IANAL,
Matthew