Re: [gtk-list] Re: C++ and gtk+

[David Pettersson <dapet mai liu se>]

Hi,

If I used a C struct instead of C++ class, I would have the same problem
still, not solveble by using gtk--.

David


On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Arjan J. Molenaar wrote:

> hi,
> 
> GTK+ is a C library for X, not a C++ library. Using GTK-- is a very thin wrapper,
> so you won't notice the difference. You can still create your own classes in C++.
> 
> regards,
> Arjan
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: leon@udmnet.ru [mailto:leon@udmnet.ru]
> > Sent: Monday, December 20, 1999 10:43 AM
> > To: gtk-list@redhat.com
> > Subject: [gtk-list] Re: C++ and gtk+
> > 
> > 
> > RNG wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi David,
> > > 
> > > if you want to use Gtk with C++, you're probably better off
> > > using one of the C++ bindings (Gtk--, VDK) ... check the
> > > gtk+ homepage (www.gtk.org) for details ...
> > > 
> > 
> > But it is such a pain in the neck to try to bind C++ to
> > gtk. Have someone thought of abstracting one more layer
> > in gtk so as to make C and C++ interfaces equal in their
> > level? I mean a (lower) layer atop of which to build 
> > brother/sister interfaces to C, C++ etc.
> > 
> > -- 
> > IBM Pollyanna Principle: Machines should work. People should think.
> > 
> > -- 
> > To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe 
> > gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
> > 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
>