Re: [gtk-list] Re: I want to understand



>  This just magnifies the mistake that GTK was not built on top of an
>  strong OO language like Java, since more and more OO facilities are
>  being built by hand.
>  
>  What's happening here is that GTK is converging on having the same,
>  yet inferior capabilities, as a genuine OO language and replicating
>  the same OO facilities as an OO language by "hand", which is
>  completely ridiculous given the tedious error prone amount of work
>  that it takes to maintain the OO layer.

I'm looking forward to seeing your reimplementation of GTK+ in Java, then.

  Federico



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]