Re: [gtk-list] Re: announce: yet another gtk+ C++ wrapper (no caps as Owen suggest)
- From: Mario Motta <mmotta guest net>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: announce: yet another gtk+ C++ wrapper (no caps as Owen suggest)
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 09:09:43 +0200
On Thu, 10 Sep 1998, Karl Nelson wrote:
>(By the way, which is garbage and why? Gtk-- seems to work
>well for me and you seem to feel VDK is good, so we
>aren't talking about something as simple as one being garbage.)
gtk-- certainly not, is made well in my opinion and i personally hope will
be better in the future, VDK is too young to say, i was referring simply to
users ability to judge if a tool is good or not without be influenced by
>Unfortunately, there will then also be a division of effort. Since
>both packages will need to be mantained and there is very little
>showing in the C++ department in Gtk already, (many C++ people
>are in the QT camp) it seems like the pool of available testers,
>users, and mantainers is small. Was this project ever discussed with
>the community to see what they needed/wanted?
i can agree with you unless you think that new projects can
attract new people.
>On the other hand, my limited understanding of VDK is that it
>has largely different design goals. Therefore, we should
>certainly not dismiss it. However, some discussion of its
>scope may be needed. If one or the other projects
>expands to eliminate the need of the other, people are
>going to be unhappy.
gtk-list is here also for non-strictly-technical topics, but we should avoid
that are not useful and are time wasting.
AI Research Group - Rimini
] [Thread Prev