Re: [gtk-list] Re: gtk or gtk--
- From: Robert Roebling <roebling sun2 ruf uni-freiburg de>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: gtk or gtk--
- Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1998 11:23:29 +0100
Cyrille Artho wrote:
There are also other C++ wrappers based on the GTK+ toolkit.
As far as I know there are currently three: VDK, wxWindows
and V. The last two being cross-platform toolkits. All three
will add an extra layer between your app and the toolkit,
for better or worse. In contrast to GTK--, whish is very
thin language wrapper around the GTK+, these toolkits try
to provide classes for more than just the GUI toolkit - once
again for better or worse.
> Thanks to all people who responded to my question. I see it like this:
> - In terms of documentation, qt is a clear winner.
wxWindows has 700 Kb of documentation for almost every single
method call. Sadly, we have no tutorial yet.
> - qt and gtk-- look nearly the same, and a text file at gtk.org
> indicates that a conversion is not too hard.
The two kits have no function call or class name or whatever
in common. But surely, I'm missing something here.
Robert
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Roebling "Write once, compile, run everywhere"
wxWindows/GTK http://wesley.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~wxxt
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]