Re: [gtk-list] Re: Naming convension for GTK aplications
- From: Jim Harmon <jharmon telecnnct com>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: Naming convension for GTK aplications
- Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 12:36:32 -0400
d. hall wrote:
> // thus on 25 May 1998 02:22:32 -0000, nelson-gtk wrote:
> > email@example.com writes:
> >> > For example: if I call my aplicacion "newapp",
> >> > should I name it "gnewapp" or something like that?
Only if it was really a "GNUapp".
> >> PLEASE don't. we have too many g* apps as it is :)
What is this, a Communications "g*app"?
> > Gwhy gdo gyou gfeel gthat gway? Gmaybe gwe gdon't ghave genough??
> G... no, GTE... err K.
> If it's a pretty generic name (no 'g' pun intended) a prefix'ed 'g'
> makes it more distinctive. But I have to agree, there are far too
> many 'g*' app names, and that's not only the gtk apps, there are
> several non-GTK but GNU apps.
The "G" inclusion rule of thumb SHOULD be "Does the un-acronym'd name of
the application include/start with any word that starts with "G".
If the App is "Gnome-Phone", then an ACRONYM of "gPh" would be
appropriate for a GTK application.
If it's a GIMP add-on/plug-in, it could appropriately be g<something>.
But more importantly, if it's to be distributed with the GNU FSF
license, and the name can easily absorb the G in hard or soft mode, add
But that's my OPINION, and not backed by any convention real or
> To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe firstname.lastname@example.org < /dev/null
Jim Harmon The Telephone Connection
email@example.com Rockville, Maryland
] [Thread Prev