Re: Patch?
- From: Daniel Egger t-online de (Daniel Egger)
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Patch?
- Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 21:14:12 +0000
On Wed, 13 May 1998, you wrote:
>My impression is that the original gives a slightly "sharper"
>look at the corners, while your look is slightly rounded.
Maybe, but as all shadows are casted by a virtual light
off 10:30 o'clock, the old look isn't really correct IMHO.
>(Remember, when looking at this with xmag, what is being drawn here is
>not two overlapping rectangles - it is a groove. And since the groove
>can't be accurately represented at this resolution, what is correct is
>a matter of what looks better. "The inner feel")
By the way: It would be simply possible to draw those frame by 2 rectangles.
>The second is issue how they are drawn:
>Various places in the GTK+ code assume that the draw_shadow
>code will draw an entire rectangle, not a rectangle missing
>two pixels. So if you want those to be in a neutral color,
>they should be explicitly be drawn with:
> widget->style->mid_gc[widget->state]
Is possbile. But why were shadows draw by the same color
before as in my patch?
Another thing I changed with my patch are the linethickness variables and loops
which simply did nothing. If the variables are changed to a bigger value the
results look rather weird.
BTW: Do you think it would be a performance improvement to draw the frames
with rectangles instead of lines?
--
Servus,
Daniel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]