Re: [gtk-list] Re: Windows NT port of GTK+
- From: Matt Kimball <mkimball xmission com>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: Windows NT port of GTK+
- Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 11:55:40 -0700
On Thu, Apr 30, 1998 at 09:36:31PM -0700, fractture wrote:
> I definately think if your going to port GTK+ it needs to be to a
> Gnuized library environment+compiler like djgpp or gnu-win32!! We
> want to make porting easier, not do advertizing for some MS product.
> I am all for it as long as it doesn't rely on comercial products,
> especially MS's stuff. If someone wants to make VC++ development
> easier, that could be done later,...but the first port should
> absolutely be to a free environment.
This is pretty much how I feel as well. I just wondered if others
felt differently. (In my experience, the Microsoft tools *are* easier
to use when developing for Win32. But freedom gained by using GPLed
tools outweigh any ease of development gained by using VC++).
] [Thread Prev