Re: [gtk-list] Patch to solve a litle typographic mistake that happend 86 times
- From: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- To: Lista GTK <gtk-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Patch to solve a litle typographic mistake that happend 86 times
- Date: Sat, 4 Jul 1998 13:12:45 +0200 (CEST)
On Fri, 3 Jul 1998, David Abilleira Freijeiro wrote:
> Hello.
> As subject says this is a simple patch to correct a typographic bug. I
> wan't able to upload it to ftp.gimp.org becouse it says there is too
> many people loaded. I could not upload another patch I´ve sent to the
> list few days ago.
> Here are the README and the patch itself:
>
> -------- gtk-abilleira-980703-0.patch.README -------------
> This patch is to correct a litle typographic mistaky in some code
> comments.
> This is a non important mistake, but is curiosius to see the same bug
> 86 time GTK+ source code. This patch is against 980701 snapshot.
>
> In gtkobject.c you can see:
>
> void
> gtk_object_init_type (void)
> {
> GtkType object_type = 0;
> GtkTypeInfo object_info =
> {
> "GtkObject",
> sizeof (GtkObject),
> sizeof (GtkObjectClass),
> (GtkClassInitFunc) gtk_object_class_init,
> (GtkObjectInitFunc) gtk_object_init,
> /* reversed_1 */ NULL, <-- Must be reserved not reversed
> /* reversed_2 */ NULL,
AAAAARRRRRRGGGGGGHHHH!
i'm guilty as charged!
people told me often enough, but somehow this typo slipped through, ugh ;(
ok, i'm going to have another 68 files commit then ;(
thanx for mentioning it and pointing out my stupidity btw ;)
> (GtkClassInitFunc) gtk_object_base_class_init,
> };
>
> Perhaps due to cut & paste this mistake happend in 86 widgets.
> This patch is a simple sed execution to change these strings.
> -----------------------------
---
ciaoTJ
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]