Re: [gtk-list] Re: Glade - UI Builder
- From: Andreas Kostyrka <andreas rainbow studorg tuwien ac at>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: Glade - UI Builder
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 22:56:59 +0200 (CEST)
On 30 Apr 1998, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> This is defintly harder to parse than a lisp-like syntax. And
> definetly harder to munge with text processing tools. Would it be
> possible to have the output be Lisp-like?
Actually I agree, Lisp is probably easier to parse :)
> I just read a comment from someone that said that Lisp output is not
> nice to him, well, it is not like the programmer is going to deal with
> it in his daily life nor has the programmer any business making
> changes to that lisp-like file, but if he needs to, he has got the
> power to do it.
No, the worry about the Lisp save format is, that somebody could use the
gtk-guile bindings as a definition. And that is bad. This is actually
worse than a C generator: A C file I can compile and link with, and I'll
probably have to supply some small linkage module. (At least for TOM :) ).
So make it lisp like, but DO NOT make it guile.
Andreas
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]