Re: [gtk-list] Re: A proposal for Gtk+

["Leareth *" <leareth hotmail com>]

I would bet your right, as the Gtk maintainer(s) developed the library
in the first place, with the look & feel it has. But on the other hand
, does it really matter? I am sick of the motif look in general, and
if anyone else agree's with me, we can help Gtk go beond it's 
limitaions. Please see my original post for my thoughts on Gtk's new
look. If you don't like them... Well thats ok, as I suspect the base
Gtk maintainer(s) will agree with you and not adopt the new style. 
This will, in the end, only mean that there will be two Gtk library's
available to the public.

NOTE: This does not mean I wouldn't like the support of the base Gtk+
developers... I just don't expect it :)

----Original Message Follows----
From: atai@ece.ucsd.edu (Andy Tai)
Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: A proposal for Gtk+

I strongly oppose you changing the look and feel of gtk.  I am sure the 
gtk maintainer and most other authors of programs using gtk will oppose 
it as well. Gtk cannot be changed just to adapt to your taste.


-- 
Li-Cheng Tai (Andy Tai)                       e-mail: atai@ece.ucsd.edu




Jasper, The Guru of Time. <leareth@hotmail.com>
-- You've got to lose, to know how to win.




-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.6.3i

mQCNAzQ8X2kAAAEEALHRNs76bkJoKk9K5pbKHO59fm3v6rYA13MYB6A8JVZU+yLH
O9U4YYuGuwRtF8oLfL/TJKOo0P38B+AptILSoj2k2vbvJNignRKfUQwFW7j9cP/g
6LGKMrAu6KakReMA84ZvfqXSSS0RGQDADyQzQLyXtD321GnYkIlC+OWEBoihAAUR
tC9KYXNwZXIsIFRoZSBHdXJ1IG9mIFRpbWUuIDxsZWFyZXRoQGhvdG1haWwuY29t
PokAlQMFEDQ8X2mJQvjlhAaIoQEBx8oD/Rw1K0pIrthWzNcLk818bFMmwYOQiV1G
axneJaZHsTpTBNl8ZSWfPwsF4t7GcdwZF3OpLtl/gvTcngGpng/xd0CHXiQmI+Qm
9dkqgx0rTNQ2l3P4sKG66Zp2xYKphVw5WX96yMedAwFSi5N/9IKV9I7QjmeMQ03A
cZIkAZPao9WD
=rLPQ
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com