Pango vs Harfbuzz
- From: Mohit Sindhwani <ml3p onghu com>
- To: gtk-i18n-list gnome org
- Subject: Pango vs Harfbuzz
- Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 12:46:54 +0800
Hi All,
This is my first post to this list as I get started at looking at font
and language support for one of our applications. Our application runs
on an embedded target and I want to make its language support
independent of the operating system.
So, it seemed that implementing a stack based on Pango, Cairo, freetype
and font config might be a good option since we could bundle the
necessary fonts, etc. with our application and it could handle the
necessary stuff within the application. We already use UTF-8 within the
database for all the dynamic text/ searchable entities, so we thought we
should be fine.
However, as I started exploring, I read: http://behdad.org/text/ and got
rather confused about Harfbuzz - should we use Pango or should we use
Harfbuzz or should we use both? Our target is a GL-ES 2.0 device (iOS,
Android, Windows CE, etc.) and we are unsure if we should use GL
directly or should we use Cairo (probably a question for a different
mailing list).
It may be that I am not providing the correct information that you need
(since it's my first time here).
Best Regards,
Mohit.
8/9/2012 | 12:43 PM.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]