Re: Signal argument names

[Damon Chaplin <damon kendo fsnet co uk>]

On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 01:07, Matthias Clasen wrote:

> I have this mostly working, see the attached patch. There are some
> complications, because we have to be careful to prefer the param names
> from source over those generated by gtkdoc-scangobj (those pesky argn),
> unlike normal functions, where we prefer the names from the templates
> over the source names (why ?).

I think I did this as quite a few inline comment blocks had errors in
them - missing parameters, wrong order etc. So comparing parameter names
was a sanity check to cut down on the number of errors.

Your patch looks good. It means you can only rename the signal handler
parameters in inline comments, but I don't mind that.

Damon