Re: webassembly
- From: Daniel Kasak <d j kasak dk gmail com>
- To: Andrea Zagli <azagli libero it>
- Cc: GTK Devel List <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: webassembly
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 10:13:45 +1100
While I concede this ( webassembly ) and broadway are most likely dead-in-the-water for gtk+4, there's no harm in me putting my hand up as a possible user, if such things did eventuate. It's probably more likely that a wayland compositor gets welded to an RDP/VNC server and becomes usable? As for broadway being a 'toy' ... it's a pretty impressive toy, really. It does everything I wanted, other than copy & paste, and was remarkably stable. It wouldn't be so attractive if it wasn't damn near impossible to build gtk+ on Windows ... or if flatpak a) worked on windows, and b) would build perl stuff.
Anyway, if there is enough demand, we can look into pooling our cash and funding development ( eg via freelancer or something ). At this point, there only seems to be about a post every 6 to 12 months about broadway, and half of them are from me ;)
Dan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]