Re: gtk changes in the jhbuild moduleset

[Simon McVittie <simon mcvittie collabora co uk>]

On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 11:14 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
> wrote:
> > Which would mean nothing called "gtk+" in the modulesets? Why not
> > keep
> > either gtk 3.x or gtk 4.x with that name?
> >
> > I'd expect the "gtk+" module to build GTK+ 4.x ("the latest").
>
> I have no strong opinion on this. Not having gtk+ in the moduleset
> doesn't seem like a big deal to me. The + in the name is a bit
> awkward, tbh.

Losing the gtk+ module would mean third-party modulesets are forced to
make a decision on whether they want gtk3 or gtk4, which seems like it
might be desirable?

    S