Re: gtk changes in the jhbuild moduleset
- From: Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>
- To: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- Cc: GNOME release team <release-team gnome org>, gtk-devel-list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: gtk changes in the jhbuild moduleset
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:14:21 -0400
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net> wrote:
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 06:33 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Hi,
we are getting ready to start development of gtk 3.90 in master.
To avoid causing lots of breakage and irritation, here is the plan:
1) Switch the modulesets to use the gtk-3-22 branch for the gtk
module
2) Rename the gtk module to gtk3
3) Add a gtk4 module that follows master
4) Switch applications over to use gtk4 as they are found to work
If you see a problem with that, please let me know.
Which would mean nothing called "gtk+" in the modulesets? Why not keep
either gtk 3.x or gtk 4.x with that name?
I'd expect the "gtk+" module to build GTK+ 4.x ("the latest").
I have no strong opinion on this. Not having gtk+ in the moduleset
doesn't seem like a big deal to me. The + in the name is a bit
awkward, tbh.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]