Re: Dropping 'fringe' pixbuf loaders

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:28:17AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
After several rounds of fixing overflow and allocation failure issues in
various loaders this cycle, I'm reconsidering following the suggestion in

  wbmp, tga, ras, qtif, pcx, ani... these are probably prime candidates for
being removed.

Before doing so, I want to ask if anybody is willing to step up and
maintain these loaders.  Note that even if we drop these from gdk-pixbuf
itself, they can be maintained out-of-tree... one of the advantages of
having loaders as modules.


Hello Matthias!

Is it possible to add such modules as "third-party" module?
If so wouldn't it just be possible to create a github repository a move
these modules there - so that users can decide if they take the risk or



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]