Re: Question about triaging GTK X enhancements

[Timothy Arceri <t_arceri yahoo com au>]

On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 12:51 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> hi Tim;
>
> thanks for doing some triage on GTK bugs: it's much appreciated.

No problem.

> On 4 October 2013 08:42, Timothy Arceri <t_arceri yahoo com au> wrote:
>
> > Quick question about GTK enhancements regarding X. With focus now shifting to Wayland is it safe for me 
> > to start marking really old GTK X enhancements as wont fix?
> >
> > Two quick examples (I'm sure there is plenty more):
> >
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53353
> >
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59724
>
> woah, there! those are really retro bugs. :-)

Yeah there are still a hole bunch of really retro bugs tagged as
affecting GTK 1.2.x [1] and 1.3.x [2] 

[1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=gtk%
2B&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&version=1.2.x
[2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=gtk%
2B&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&version=1.3.x

> I think both can safely be closed as OBSOLETE, and not (just) because
> we want to switch to Wayland.
>
> ciao,
>  Emmanuele.