Re: The high-level GIO API and threading

On 09/26/2011 10:54 AM, Ayo wrote:
> least, I thought the API supported that. Browsing through the
> code of the gnutls implementation in glib-networking, I see a single
> internal state being used for both the read and write functions, with
> apparently no synchronisation whatsoever. Am I misinterpreting the
> code, or was I assuming things wrongly?

I didn't realize gnutls allowed that, but apparently it does. File a bug.

-- Dan

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]