Re: Fwd: Plans for GTK+ Bundles for win32 and win64?

On 08/09/2011 21:21, Kean Johnston wrote:
> so even 
> if we named the DLL's a bit less specifically (and just used, for example, 
> glib2.dll) that still shouldn't be a problem.

And how exactly is doing that different from what we
already have today: libglib-2.0-0.dll?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]