Re: Gail next steps (was Re: GTK and ATK)

On 2011-06-07 at 17:16, Piñeiro wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 05:11 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Emmanuele Bassi<ebassi gmail com>  wrote:
> >
> >>>0) write tests for accessible implementations
> >>>1) move modules/other/gail nach gtk/a11y
> >>>2) add tons of private headers for private structs, to share things
> >>>3) remove now unnecessary code
> >>>4) add a11y features support to core libs (mainly pango) - word
> >>>detection, cursor handling etc, share with clutter
> >>>5) figure out new interfaces for GTK to expose necessary features to
> >>>a11y (and other consumers, such as IM and OSK)
> >>we should probably establish some common interfaces so that Clutter can
> >>expose the same functionality for its own items — and so that embedding
> >>a GtkWidget inside a Clutter scene graph doesn't break the AT tools.
> >yep.
> >
> >>at the same time of 0-3 in gtk I can work on the equivalent for the
> >>Clutter side as well.
> >Isn't clutter ahead of us here ? It thought cally was already inside clutter ?
> Yes, cally is already part of clutter. So 1) doesn't apply to
> clutter. I guess that Emmanuele was talking about 5) (as cally is
> after all an ATK implementation)

yes, but Cally is also not using internal API even though it could — and
ClutterActors are generally unaware of Cally's implementation; for
instance, CallyActor installs a bunch of signal handlers where it would
be perfectly possible to have internal functions, or even call ATK/Cally
methods directly from ClutterActor.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]