Getting rid of CRT use in GLib? (was Re: Glib: a Win32 discussion)
- From: Hans Breuer <hans breuer org>
- To: Kean Johnston <kean johnston gmail com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Getting rid of CRT use in GLib? (was Re: Glib: a Win32 discussion)
- Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 17:37:02 +0200
At 10.04.2011 17:06, Kean Johnston wrote:
So? For me the only solution for any serious Windows developer is to accept
the fact, because no one can control the whole software stack on win32, not
But if one follows some basic rules regarding resource
allocation/deallocation - as outlined in my previous mail - everything can
still work just fine.
But the dependency to the CRT is not the problem, if there is only one of
them in process.
Agreed, but that is becoming almost impossible to guarantee. If we go to
any lengths to ensure a binary-compiled Glib is linked against
msvcrt.dll, and an average Windows user uses VS2010, they will run into
surprises. Even Microsoft's own code is inconsistent.
Nope, it is _my_ issue too, as the maintainer of Dia, which is using all
three. And so it is again a GLib issue, at least if the shiny new version
is made for real world use ;)
Some things are
now using VS-specific versions of the CRT while others are using
msvcrt.dll. It really is a mess, and it really is possible to eliminate
it from glib. The fact that OTHER components, such as zlib or libxml2
may be constructed to use crt is ... frankly ... their issue :)
I am trying to address glib. I'll get around to addressing the same issues in
other dependent libraries too but just becuase zlib may rely on the CRT
doesn't mean we shouldn't do what we can to make glib NOT do so.
Here you have lost me (from the we;)). Good luck in your quest ...
-------- Hans "at" Breuer "dot" Org -----------
Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to
get along without it. -- Dilbert
] [Thread Prev