Re: pixbuf<->cairo_surface_t conversion

[Havoc Pennington <hp pobox com>]

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Andrew Cowie
<andrew operationaldynamics com> wrote:
> Are you thinking of the loaders populating an image surface (and thus
> being in application memory) or populating an xlib surface (and thus
> being in X server memory?)

I'm not proposing any change here. Loaders currently go to pixbufs
(which are always application memory), and I'm proposing that when a
pixbuf uses a cairo surface as representation, that cairo surface is
always an image surface.

Havoc