Re: the 2.18 endgame
- From: Javi <javierjc1982 gmail com>
- To: Cody Russell <bratsche gnome org>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: the 2.18 endgame
- Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:32:32 +0200
2009/7/11 Cody Russell <bratsche gnome org>:
> On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 10:45 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> GTK+ 2.90:
>> - Outstanding GSEAL issues have not been resolved. bratsche spent
>> some time on it, but gave up for lack of feedback
>>
>> Here is my proposal:
>> - If people still want to do a 2.90 release in parallel with 2.18, now
>> is the time to step forward and finish the GSEAL work
>
> Mitch said he has almost gotten GIMP compiling with GSEAL, minus about
> ~10 missing functions. So this is actually not quite as far off as it
> seemed before. The big missing thing at the moment is new API for
> widget->allocation and widget->requisition, which I will try to push for
> resolution on soon.
>
There are tracker bugs for allocation[1] and flags[2] issues
Also, I've proposed a GnomeGoal to use GSEAL [3];
The page has information about the main issues I've encountered trying
to compile some modules with GSEAL activated
Hope it helps
Regards,
[1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585211
[2] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi
[3] http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/UseGseal
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]