Re: minutes of the gtk+ team meeting - 2009-01-20

[Michael Natterer <mitch bugwerft de>]

On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 16:03 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Christian Dywan <christian imendio com> wrote:
> > Am Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:25:54 +0100
> > schrieb Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch gmx de>:
> >
> >> Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> >> > Sorry I missed the last meeting, is there anything you need me
> >> > to do for GtkActivatables ?
> >>
> >> Maybe <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=570797>,
> >> "gtk_activatable_reset has a very generic name"?
> >
> > I second that, we mustn't miss that before the stable release.
> >
> > And I share the concern that _reset should be _reset_action, not only
> > for the sake of object oriented languages but for clarity as well.
> 
> But it is not resetting the action. That would just be a misnomer. If
> you want a clearer name, it would be something like
> gtk_activatable_sync_appearance_properties

What about gtk_action_resync() ?

--mitch