Re: gtk+ documentation wikified

[Dominic Lachowicz <domlachowicz gmail com>]

Yes. The most common example I can think of is when a function is deprecated.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Eugene Gorodinsky
<e gorodinsky gmail com> wrote:
> Have there been cases where documentation for some function was
> changed after that function appeared in the stable version?
>
> 2009/2/19 Dominic Lachowicz <domlachowicz gmail com>:
>> That's hard-ish to do today. GTK+'s documentation is generated in
>> large part by scanning comments in C code, which a program then turns
>> into HTML. Any proposal would require a way to keep the Wiki and the C
>> comments in-sync.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Eugene Gorodinsky
>> <e gorodinsky gmail com> wrote:
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> Since you guys are discussing the redesign of the gtk+ website, I'd
>>> like to propose an idea that I have. I've seen quite a lot of comments
>>> saying gtk+ documentation isn't as good as qt's. What do you think of
>>> having a wiki that documents all of gtk+ api?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gtk-devel-list mailing list
>>> gtk-devel-list gnome org
>>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Counting bodies like sheep to the rhythm of the war drums.
>>
>



-- 
Counting bodies like sheep to the rhythm of the war drums.