Re: GLib plans for the next cycle

2009/2/11 Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>:
> With 2.20 winding down, I think now would be a good time to talk about
> what should happen in Glib 2.22.
> One thing that has been tossed around for a long time is that it would
> be really good to have DBus support on the Glib level.

Would this support be optional? I'm concerned about making GLib
dependant on a dbus development environment on Windows as DBus has no
regular windows builds whatsoever (AFAIK).

> This would allow us to move forward with several things in GTK+ that
> will work much better if they can use DBus:
> - session support
> - unique application support

Would DBus be swappable here for something else on non freedesktop
environments? (Windows, Mac)

> Let me list some, with possible answers:

Alberto Ruiz

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]