Re: Working on 119189 this weekend

[Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org>]

Fox, Kevin M wrote:
> Hi C.J,
> 
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought something like this was already
> done. GtkGLext

Exactly.  That's why I keep saying that we want is GtkGlExt integrated into GTK+.

behdad

> http://www.k-3d.org/gtkglext/Main_Page
> 
> Kevin
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gtk-devel-list-bounces gnome org
> [mailto:gtk-devel-list-bounces gnome org] On Behalf Of C.J.
> Adams-Collier
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 4:04 PM
> To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
> Subject: Working on 119189 this weekend
> 
> Hey all,
> 
> I'm planning some time to work on 119189 this weekend.  I'm going to see
> if I can put together a patch to add gtkgl.c and friends into gtk.
> 
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119189
> 
> Behdad has suggested (and correct me if I've got this wrong, Behdad)
> that he feels that instead of creating a dedicated OpenGL drawing widget
> (similar to GtkDrawingArea), it would be better to add a method to the
> API which allows a widget to be imbued with the ability to have OpenGL
> primitives drawn to it.
> 
> What are your thoughts?  
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> C.J.
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
>