Re: GVariant for prez!

[Ryan Lortie <desrt desrt ca>]

Dan Winship wrote:
> (Alternate possibility: add a way to include type tags, so that callers
> and callees can agree that a particular "x" is to be treated as a time_t
> and not a generic int64. Eg, a signature of ":x" would mean a (string)
> type tag followed by an int64, but it would be distinct from "sx" or
> "(sx)".)

Are you proposing that this would be a standard modification to DBus itself?

Cheers