Re: GVariant for prez!

Dan Winship wrote:
(Alternate possibility: add a way to include type tags, so that callers
and callees can agree that a particular "x" is to be treated as a time_t
and not a generic int64. Eg, a signature of ":x" would mean a (string)
type tag followed by an int64, but it would be distinct from "sx" or

Are you proposing that this would be a standard modification to DBus itself?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]