Re: GObject-Introspection 0.5.0
- From: Johan Dahlin <johan gnome org>
- To: Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev gmx net>
- Cc: language-bindings gnome org, gtk-devel-list gnome org, Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- Subject: Re: GObject-Introspection 0.5.0
- Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:39:12 +0200
Paul Pogonyshev wrote:
Johan Dahlin wrote:
[...]
> I'm leaning towards using the "ownership" terminology instead of "transfer".
typedef enum {
GI_OWNERSHIP_CALLER, /* caller owns it, caller should free it after use */
GI_OWNERSHIP_CALLEE /* callee owns it, caller should leave it as it is */
} GITypeOwnership;
Just as a nitpick, these two names look very similar and quite confusing
for non-native English speakers. Maybe you could come up with something
different, especially in place of 'callee'?
Agreed, I'm open to suggestions.
caller/subroutine ?
Johan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]