GTK_STOCK icons vs. named spec
- From: John Daiker <daikerjohn gmail com>
- To: gtk-app-devel-list gnome org
- Cc: gnome-devel-list gnome org, gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: GTK_STOCK icons vs. named spec
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:56:29 -0800
Hello All,
First off, apologies for the widespread distribution of this e-mail. I
figure start big, and then the appropriate list can assist from there.
Second, I just signed up to the list (gtk-app-devel-list), but had a
specific question about using the GTK_STOCK_* naming convention versus
the 'defined text'. (eg: GTK_STOCK_SAVE vs 'gtk-save' and
GTK_STOCK_CLOSE vs 'gtk-close')
Rhythmbox currently uses the GTK_STOCK_* convention, but it has been
brought up recently
(http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=560349#c5) that perhaps this
convention is 'bad habit'.
Just looking for some insight into this, and maybe to get a feel for
what the community views as the 'best practice'.
Thanks,
John Daiker
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]