Re: Justifying the GTK+ 3.0 ABI break

From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org>
To: Morten Welinder <mwelinder gmail com>
Cc: gtk-devel-list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>, Havoc Pennington <hp pobox com>
Subject: Re: Justifying the GTK+ 3.0 ABI break
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:33:07 +0430

On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 20:01 -0400, Morten Welinder wrote:
> 
> So the maintenance burden, to the extent there is one, is _caused_ by
> deprecation.

This is ridiculous.  It's  perceived that way because all bugs against
deprecated widgets is closed WONTFIX.  It's not like if the widget was
not deprecated it would have consumed less maintainer time...

-- 
behdad
http://behdad.org/

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
 Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
        -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Justifying the GTK+ 3.0 ABI break
  - From: Morten Welinder

References:
- Justifying the GTK+ 3.0 ABI break
  - From: Murray Cumming
- Re: Justifying the GTK+ 3.0 ABI break
  - From: Johan Dahlin
- Re: Justifying the GTK+ 3.0 ABI break
  - From: Havoc Pennington
- Re: Justifying the GTK+ 3.0 ABI break
  - From: Mike Kestner
- Re: Justifying the GTK+ 3.0 ABI break
  - From: Morten Welinder

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]