Re: Astonishing allocation bug in glib-2.16.4 compiled with gcc 2.96
- From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely tana it>
- To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Astonishing allocation bug in glib-2.16.4 compiled with gcc 2.96
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:14:55 +0200
Sven Herzberg wrote:
Hi Alessandro,
Am Dienstag, den 15.07.2008, 17:04 +0200 schrieb Alessandro Vesely:
What would you say about that
It's pretty nice, I only have two comments:
* you change "only for debugging" to "always for debugging", maybe you
should simply use "iff" (or the expanded version "if and only if")
Ehm... well, actually I hope some native English speaker may retouch
it before it is possibly committed. :-)
* you drop the section about downsides of the advanced debugging,
please keep them in there
I hadn't dropped it. I just reworded it, keeping mentions to added
memory stuff and mutex-acquired global vision.
This discussion reminds me that smc_notify_tree() does not actually
check which thread does a chunk belong to. Could that result in
misbehavior? For example, it looks perfectly legal for a producer
consumer pair of threads to carefully smuggle thread-categorized
chunks of memory from the former to the latter thread; or should that
deserve an optimization warning?
Maybe the doc should be more precise. I attach a second attempt.
Index: running.sgml
===================================================================
--- running.sgml (revision 7183)
+++ running.sgml (working copy)
@@ -149,14 +149,17 @@
which performs sanity checks on the released memory slices.
Invalid slice adresses or slice sizes will be reported and lead to
a program halt.
- This option should only be used in debugging scenarios, because it
- significantly degrades GSlice performance. Extra per slice memory
- is requied to do the necessary bookeeping, and multi-thread scalability
- is given up to perform global slice validation.
- This option is mostly useful in scenarios where program crashes are encountered
- while GSlice is in use, but crashes cannot be reproduced with G_SLICE=always-malloc.
- A potential cause for such a situation that will be caught by G_SLICE=debug-blocks
- is e.g.:
+ This option is for debugging scenarios.
+ In particular, client packages sporting their own test suite should
+ <emphasis>always enable this option when running tests</emphasis>.
+ Global slice validation is ensured by storing size and address information
+ for each allocated chunk, and maintaining a global hash table of that data.
+ That way, multi-thread scalability is given up, and memory consumption is
+ increased. However, the resulting code usually performs acceptably well,
+ possibly better than with comparable memory checking carried out using
+ external tools. An example of a memory corruption scenario that cannot be
+ reproduced with <literal>G_SLICE=always-malloc</literal>, but will be caught
+ by <literal>G_SLICE=debug-blocks</literal> is as follows:
<programlisting>
void *slist = g_slist_alloc(); /* void* gives up type-safety */
g_list_free (slist); /* corruption: sizeof (GSList) != sizeof (GList) */
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]