Re: GTK+ Website Review - Hosting Windows Binaries
- From: Martyn Russell <martyn imendio com>
- To: "gtk-de >> Gtk+ Developers" <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GTK+ Website Review - Hosting Windows Binaries
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:51:31 +0000
Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:44:01AM +0000, Martyn Russell wrote:
>> Murray Cumming wrote:
>>> HTML is slightly more likely to be kept-up-to-date than DocBook.
>>> However, no FAQ is likely to be kept up to date unless it's very
>>> easy to edit/comment.
>> Well, given the new site has proper CSS and HTML separation,
>> editing the FAQ will be no harder to edit than the docbook SGML.
> Why not a CMS then ? No flame please. Just wondering...
Well, that would probably be ideal and perhaps possible if the hardware
was permitting but it isn't and as we found from this recent thread:
no sysadmins seems to be stepping forward regarding this.
As a result, this will have to wait.
] [Thread Prev