Re: Logo (was Re: GTK+ Website Review)
- From: "Xan Lopez" <xan gnome org>
- To: "Mikael Hallendal" <micke imendio com>
- Cc: "Felix Rabe \(public\)" <public felixrabe textdriven com>, Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Logo (was Re: GTK+ Website Review)
- Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 12:45:23 +0300
On 10/7/07, Mikael Hallendal <micke imendio com> wrote:
> 6 okt 2007 kl. 19.41 skrev Christophe Dehais:
>
> Hi,
>
> For what it's worth, I like it a lot!
>
> I personally like it much better than a variant of the current skewed
> box.
I wonder if I'm the only person alive that really likes the GTK+ box
logo. I love its cranky, not-really-serious look and feel. Granted,
it's probably not the best logo in the world for a world-class
toolkit, and it could use a refreshment, but going for the usual
corporate-logo-with-reflections-and-bland-colors would be a downer for
me.
My useless 2 cents in the classic bike shed discussion :)
Cheers, Xan
>
> Cheers,
> Micke
>
> > Hi list!
> >
> > Today, I got bored of my work, so I played a bit with Inskape and came
> > up with another logo proposition. I can't get anything inspiring out
> > of the "cube" design, so here is a completely different approach. It's
> > not very colorful, but maybe the original blue green and red colors
> > could find there way as some shade or reflection.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Christophe
> >
> >
> > On 5/29/07, Christophe Dehais <christophe dehais gmail com> wrote:
> >> Keeping the cube idea, I added some perspective to it (instead of a
> >> somewhat flat orthographic projection).
> >>
> >> I agree with the 'fragile' remark. Maybe having glossy but not
> >> transparent faces ?
> >>
> >> Attached an inkscape file (with a perspective helper on one layer)
> >> and a preview.
> >> The letters should also have correct perspective.
> >>
> >> cheers,
> >> Christophe.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 5/29/07, Mathias Hasselmann <mathias hasselmann gmx de> wrote:
> >>> Am Dienstag, den 29.05.2007, 01:31 +0200 schrieb Felix Rabe
> >>> (public):
> >>>>>>> I wonder where the GTK logo proposal went? I think it would
> >>>>>>> fit quite
> >>>>>>> well in this design.
> >>>>>> Actually Andreas was doing some work there. I was sent a few
> >>>>>> ideas and
> >>>>>> they looked good, but nothing further so far.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I might have another proposal based on the first one from
> >>>>> Christophe
> >>>>> ready in a short while.
> >>>
> >>> Those detached, glossy faces look cool, but they also make the
> >>> logo look
> >>> fragile. Well, and "fragile" that's definitly not a term I do or
> >>> want
> >>> associate with GTK+...
> >>>
> >>> Ciao,
> >>> Mathias
> >>> --
> >>> Mathias Hasselmann <mathias hasselmann gmx de>
> >>> http://taschenorakel.de/
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> >>> gtk-devel-list gnome org
> >>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> <gtk-logo.png>
> >> <gtk-logo.svg>
> > _______________________________________________
> > gtk-devel-list mailing list
> > gtk-devel-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
>
>
>
> --
> Imendio AB, http://www.imendio.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]