Re: g_format_file_size_for_display()



On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 05:14:31PM -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> Big deal :)  When you see 61.2 MB you think, "oh, file system overhead!
> ripples in the time-space continuum".  Nobody cares about that.
> 
> Back to my original question:  should this function be called
> g_format_size_for_display()?  It's not for files only.

I have no idea whether to use SI or computer units,
but the fact that there's debate suggests holding
off til there's more experience.

Once a few cut-n-pasted versions exist,
then you can decide if they are all the same...

- dave


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]