Re: is glib too bloated?

On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 02:31 -0400, Gabriel Schulhof wrote:
> In this latter case, having a small, highly optimized library with
> only the useful data structures could be more desirable. 


There is very marginal benefit in reducing the number of symbols in a
shared lib, but definite costs in increasing the number of shared libs.
Please end that thread.   There are 2^n-2 ways to choose a nontrivial
subset of n symbols and for any subset there will be someone that want
it in a separate lib.  It's not going to happen.  Any further discussion
will be just noise.


"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
 Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
        -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]