Re: GTK+ Mac OS X state of the union
- From: Adriano <adriano euma com>
- To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GTK+ Mac OS X state of the union
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:22:59 +0200
Andres,
Il giorno 28/mar/06, alle ore 09:56, Anders Carlsson ha scritto:
Hello,
For the last three months I've been working on making the GTK+ Mac
OS X
port in a somewhat feature-complete state so we can slap a "1.0"
tag on
it. The progress (as well as the remaining items) can be found on
http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/Gtk_Mac_OS_X/Roadmap
I am eager to have a native Gtk+ port on Mac Os X because I hate the
poor level of integration of OpenOffice and other Gtk based tools on
Mac.
So I want to thank you for your work.
The most challenging task remaining now is to make GTK+ use the
built-in
double-buffering features that exist in Mac OS X; I have sort of an
idea
on how to do this and I'll send off a proposal shortly to the list,
since
this most certainly changes some of the low-level parts of GDK)
We at Imendio always welcome help, there's a list of things to do
availabe
on http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/Gtk_Mac_OS_X/Things_to_do with
varying degrees of difficulty.
I considered to see wether I could help with this work. I do not
write code that frequently, but I hoped I could be useful...
I managed to install the Gtk machinery on my ibok. I installed all
the tools in the reuired version, and then all the libraries, one by
one...
Now the point is that I have a really impressive bunch of code on my
machine ! Pango, Cairo, atk, Gtk... wow !
I don't understand all this code ! Who does call who, when ? What's
the intended model ?
How am I supposed to flip inside the framework ?
Is there any class diagram or collaboration diagram or any other kind
of diagram ?
I considered Eclipse with the c++ module but it crashes :-(
I considered some Emacs based tools but learning Emacs is something
that could be more demanding than porting the whole thing perfectly
How do you use to deal with this problem ?
Does it at least seems reasonful to you or you just don't feel it ?
Thanks so much
Bye
Catonano
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]