Re: Unloading sequence of GTK
- From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt metux de>
- To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Unloading sequence of GTK
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:04:00 +0200
* James Henstridge <james jamesh id au> schrieb:
Hi,
> >Its easier than people might think, and it reduces much of the
> >code complexity. glib also makes some other prerequisites, so
> >I dont see why an glib3-user couldn't be expected to go along
> >with an gc ...
> >
> One of the strengths of glib is that it can be used just about
> anywhere. If it relied on a GC, people would need to consider
> how that GC interacts with the rest of the application. For
> example, if you have Java and glib in the same process, do the
> two GCs interact properly?
Why should they ?
They both allocate their chunks from their own pool, so no one
interfers with the other one's memory.
cu
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
rsync://sources.metux.de/metux-patches
---------------------------------------------------------------------
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]