Re: Language bindings and popup_menu and show_help signals
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Federico Mena Quintero <federico ximian com>, Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>, Philip Langdale <plangdale vmware com>
- Subject: Re: Language bindings and popup_menu and show_help signals
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:14:30 +0200
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 13:18 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 18:21 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 15:59 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 20:22 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > > > The API cannot change, by definition :)
> > > >
> > > > What definition? If some G_SIGNAL_ACTION signals should be wrapped, how
> > > > can I know which ones should be and which ones should not be wrapped?
> > >
> > > We cannot change the public APIs once they are released. Those signals
> > > are part of the public APIs, so we can't change them. Just bind them
> > > all.
> >
> > That's not what we were told. We were told not to wrap keybinding
> > signals. I can't find the email (which I'm pretty sure was from Owen.
> >
> > We were told that we should never have wrapped these signals:
> > http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gtk%2B/gtk/gtktreeview.h?r1=1.56&r2=1.57
> > so the API change should not have affected us. Should I wrap these now?
>
> Anyone?
I would really really like an answer to this. We seem to need to wrap the
popup_menu and show_help signals, but I have no confidence that I won't be
told later that we shouldn't have wrapped them.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]