Re: Proposal for 2.8: Glog

Dnia 04-05-2005, śro o godzinie 11:23 +0300, Tor Lillqvist napisał:
> > Well, standard mode of operation is to redirect everything to stderr,
> > and you can't really change it without custom handler, since you'd like
> > it to output into, well, custom location :). That goes for separate
> > files as well as redirecting to syslog().
> Well, then the current Glog code from Gstreamer needs enhancements
> before it would go in GLib. It doesn't give enough new functionality
> otherwise (IMHO).

Is this really a blocker though? I don't think there's anything that
would require modifications to Glog, just a Simple Matter of Programming
(TM) necessary handlers.

> > I guess we could provide some standard extra handlers out of the
> > box, you'd need to give detailed requirements for them, so someone
> > can code it.
> I don't yet have any more detailled requirements or ideas than what I
> mentioned in my previous message.

I'd appreciate if you (and Stefan, and anyone else who has ideas about
what else needs to go into Glog) put that into in form suitable for
later hacking on feature, so that it doesn't get lost.


Maciej Katafiasz <ml mathrick org>

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]