Re: g_object_ref_sink and GUnowned

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 19:02 +0100, Tim Janik wrote:
> in fact, there is no technical reason for this. so many people have
> argued this to be better though (havoc even went so far as to argue
> why this would be conceptually neccessary), that i decided to simply
> sponsor an object type if that helps the majority to understand which
> objects are floating and which are not.

Not that it's all that relevant ;-) but I also thought a flag in the
class would be fine (and I thought a separate class would be fine too),
just seems to me it should be somehow marked. James made a good point
that right now it's already poorly marked, but why make it worse...

Havoc