Re: GtkFileSystemGnomeVFS
- From: Sven Neumann <sven gimp org>
- To: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- Cc: Evan Martin <martine danga com>, Dan Winship <danw ximian com>, Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, Federico Mena Quintero <federico ximian com>, "gtk-devel-list gnome org" <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GtkFileSystemGnomeVFS
- Date: 16 Feb 2004 11:50:17 +0100
Hi,
Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com> writes:
> > libs in order to benefit from the new GTK+ file chooser. IMO it was
> > already a bad idea to call the VFS layer gnome-vfs.
>
> I don't understand this comment. Are you saying that the name is all
> that matters? So, If we called libgnomeui libusefulwidgets instead, the
> anti-GNOME users wouldn't complain?
I know that it is stupid, but yes, I do believe that the name matters
for a lot of people. It's a good thing that libxml2 isn't called
gnome-xml any longer and it has certainly helped it's widespread
acceptance. If gnome-vfs wouldn't be dependent on bonobo and wouldn't
have gnome in it's name, that would make it easier for applications
that aren't strictly GNOME apps to depend on it. I am not trying to
convince you to do a name change, I am only outlining that the name
can matter.
Sven
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]