Re: ltmain.sh
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: David Bustos <david bustos name>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: ltmain.sh
- Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 16:25:16 -0400 (EDT)
David Bustos <david bustos name> writes:
> Why do glib and gtk+ include such an odd version of ltmain.sh? It
> (VERSION=1.4.2, TIMESTAMP=1.922.2.54 2001/09/11 03:33:37) refuses to
> install libraries in directories other than what they were configured
> for, while neither the libtool 1.4.2 from the libtool website
> (VERSION=1.4.2, TIMESTAMP=1.922.2.53 2001/09/11 03:18:52) nor the
> libtool 1.4.2 in Debian (VERSION=1.4.2a,
> TIMESTAMP=1.922.2.100 2002/06/26 07:25:14) do this?
The libtool distributed with GLib and GTK+ includes a patch
necessary for correct installation in a different directory
than the configured directory. If you use stock libtool
you will either get failure on installation, or worse,
a mislinked install.
However, the patch does require a "strict" setup ... if you
configure with --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc, then
installing into:
libdir = /foo/usr/lib
sysconfdir = /foo/etc
Will work.
libdir = /foo/lib
sysconfdir = /foo/etc
Won't. This is probably the limitation you are complaining
about.
Regards,
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]