Re: New release of GTK+ libraries (1.3.15). Please test!
- From: Sander Vesik <sv117949 ireland sun com>
- To: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
- Cc: "Padraig O'Briain" <Padraig Obriain sun com>, charlet ACT-Europe FR, otaylor redhat com, gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: New release of GTK+ libraries (1.3.15). Please test!
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:00:08 +0000 (GMT)
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, James Henstridge wrote:
> Padraig O'Briain wrote:
>
> >I have used -no-undefined in LDFLAGS in ATK and GAIL to catch problems (mostly
> >typos) at compile time rather than run time.
> >
> >One could omit -no-undefined, I suppose.
> >
> Last I checked, the libgcc library isn't meant to be linked against
> shared libs, but rather programs (at least, that was the idea before
> they started building a shared libgcc (AFAIK)). So the libs _would_
> have undefined symbols, but they would be resolved against the syms in
> the main program.
>
Well, thats pretty broken if you used gcc to build the library but not the
program. If you have to know what compiler the shared library was built
with (and potentially build/link the program with the same one) you are in
the same situation that was supposed tobe bad about using c++...
> James.
>
> --
> Email: james daa com au
> WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/
>
Sander
I see a dark sail on the horizon
Set under a dark cloud that hides the sun
Bring me my Broadsword and clear understanding
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]